Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 51524 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 51524 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.
William O. Chaudoir v. City of Sturgeon Bay
, Stats., it has the right to specially assess the Chaudoirs for the cost of extending sewer and water
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., it has the right to specially assess the Chaudoirs for the cost of extending sewer and water
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alan Berndt v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
The Berndts accepted an offer of settlement that included damages of $11,000 plus costs and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7248 - 2017-09-20
The Berndts accepted an offer of settlement that included damages of $11,000 plus costs and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7248 - 2017-09-20
Peggy L. Brennan v. Colleen A. Lampereur
car from a ditch, that she is entitled to prejudgment interest and double costs, and that State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14752 - 2005-03-31
car from a ditch, that she is entitled to prejudgment interest and double costs, and that State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14752 - 2005-03-31
John Holz v. Busy Bees Contracting, Inc.
as to the Holzes’ costs, fees and reasonable attorney’s fees related to this appeal. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13892 - 2005-03-31
as to the Holzes’ costs, fees and reasonable attorney’s fees related to this appeal. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13892 - 2005-03-31
Harvey Radke v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
for his cost in defending the suit as well as any monies Radke was obligated to pay as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11924 - 2005-03-31
for his cost in defending the suit as well as any monies Radke was obligated to pay as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11924 - 2005-03-31
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. Paul W. Lenhardt
those fees part of the cost of the frivolous action. Mary Jane points to the words “an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
those fees part of the cost of the frivolous action. Mary Jane points to the words “an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15820 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
be required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which totaled $6232.45, as of October 25, 2006
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28981 - 2007-05-10
be required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which totaled $6232.45, as of October 25, 2006
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28981 - 2007-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what they’re suppose[d] to do. Each side will pay one-half of the costs. And his opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251303 - 2019-12-18
what they’re suppose[d] to do. Each side will pay one-half of the costs. And his opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251303 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
for $15,000 with costs. Mainstreet declined and Simandl & Murray filed a motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50325 - 2014-09-15
for $15,000 with costs. Mainstreet declined and Simandl & Murray filed a motion seeking summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50325 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 807.01(3) (2007-08)[1] to settle the matter for $15,000 with costs. Mainstreet declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21
. Stat. § 807.01(3) (2007-08)[1] to settle the matter for $15,000 with costs. Mainstreet declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21