Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 91282 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Washburn County v. Mark Casper
of the circuit court for Washburn County: WARREN WINTON, Judge. Affirmed. CANE, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11367 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Washburn County: WARREN WINTON, Judge. Affirmed. CANE, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Simmons
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2001-02). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2001-02). No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
there by police, who eventually arrested and charged him. Reetz's appeal is confined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
there by police, who eventually arrested and charged him. Reetz's appeal is confined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11106 - 2005-03-31
State v. Travis J. Smith
and contacted the Milwaukee police department. Two Milwaukee police detectives went to the hotel and arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
and contacted the Milwaukee police department. Two Milwaukee police detectives went to the hotel and arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
by his statements to police at the time of his arrest (which he later admitted were untrue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
by his statements to police at the time of his arrest (which he later admitted were untrue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI App 23
arrest would have taken place or a reasonable question on your part would have been, ‘Why wasn’t DeBraska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35244 - 2009-02-23
arrest would have taken place or a reasonable question on your part would have been, ‘Why wasn’t DeBraska
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35244 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
State v. John M. Kieffer
¶2 We first consider those facts known to the arresting officers at the time of the search. Early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
¶2 We first consider those facts known to the arresting officers at the time of the search. Early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Brookfield v. Daniel D. Ulmen
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) and (g) (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3624 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b) and (g) (1999-2000). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3624 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Zamitalo
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JOSEPH E. WIMMER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JOSEPH E. WIMMER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
JUDGES: Eich, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14542 - 2017-09-21
JUDGES: Eich, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. Concurred: Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14542 - 2017-09-21