Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20411 - 20420 of 86208 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.

State of Arizona v. Brian L. Nowak
support, and (2) whether the trial court had the power to modify the Arizona child support order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2007-01-18

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
A publication of the Wisconsin Judiciary Home News Third Branch eNews Volume 5, Issue 2 2026 Spring Judicial
/news/thirdbranch/feb26/springelection.htm - 2026-05-18

State v. Matthew A. Bennett
decline his invitation and affirm the trial court judgment. ¶2 The history and facts necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15328 - 2005-05-02

State v. Charles R. Seibel
of the circuit court. ¶2 The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6857 - 2013-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
that (1) she abandoned her children, (2) she would be unable to meet the conditions of return within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28276 - 2007-03-05

John W. Gibson v.
for failure to include repayment plans. ¶2 We determine that the recommended license suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17261 - 2012-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons discussed below, we disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Prochaska does not dispute the basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82589 - 2012-05-16

State v. Gary L. Janda
a Machner hearing.[2] Finally, we affirm his conviction because we conclude that although the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2387 - 2005-08-31

State v. Gerald D. Taylor
. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and are non-meritorious, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that they are responsible for damages caused to a barn located on the leased property. I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98615 - 2005-03-31