Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111198 - 2017-09-21
the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 1
to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45391 - 2014-09-15
to be clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Gogin
of the Strickland standard. ¶12 We review a determination of prejudice de novo because it presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
of the Strickland standard. ¶12 We review a determination of prejudice de novo because it presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
Act to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
Act to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 838. Then, we review de novo whether the facts of the case show that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 838. Then, we review de novo whether the facts of the case show that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roger Johnson
of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7410 - 2017-09-20
of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7410 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56842 - 2014-09-15
of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663, 671, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
we review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14502 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14502 - 2017-09-21
Col D'var Graphics, Inc. v. Forrester Enterprises, Inc.
an insurance policy provides coverage is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Lechner v. Scharrer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8275 - 2005-03-31
an insurance policy provides coverage is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Lechner v. Scharrer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joel R. Zarnke
review de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
review de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21