Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20451 - 20460 of 75082 for judgment for us.

State v. Carrie K. Elmer
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3889 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Carl Ashley, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ELLEN K. BERZ, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980592 - 2025-07-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: CARL ASHLEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David J. Berg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16030 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mary Ellen Kuesel v. Firstar Trust Company
Trust (Kuesel Trust), appeal from an order for summary judgment dismissing their objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4732 - 2017-09-19

Phoenix Contractors, Inc. v. Affiliated Capital Corporation
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Lee S. Dreyfus, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6796 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Harvey Radke v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
a motion for summary judgment using the same methodology as the trial court. See M & I First Nat’l Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11924 - 2017-09-21

Mary Ellen Kuesel v. Firstar Trust Company
of the John T. Kuesel Living Trust (Kuesel Trust), appeal from an order for summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4732 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying relief from judgment. We conclude this court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35958 - 2009-03-23