Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2061 - 2070 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App 74, ¶27, 343 Wis. 2d 434, 819 N.W.2d 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12

96 CV 1507 John Boughton v. Firstar Bank Wisconsin
. Appellants urge this court to adopt a de novo standard to review the application of a legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13188 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
review issues of constitutional fact de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11600 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig A. Sommer
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8157 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frederick B. Rogers
reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196, 203, 565 N.W.2d 191 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4316 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim. Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02

[PDF] Strip-Rite, Inc. v. Todd C. Smith
in a commercial metal laundry and chemical de-rusting enterprise. Common stock was delivered to Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4520 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Discussion ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135469 - 2015-02-23

Crossmark, Inc. v. Nick DeGeorge
the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as those employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4993 - 2005-03-31