Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20651 - 20660 of 29821 for des.
Search results 20651 - 20660 of 29821 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118308 - 2014-07-28
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118308 - 2014-07-28
State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11241 - 2005-03-31
State v. Will E. Edwards
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34833 - 2008-12-10
2010 WI APP 10
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Bushelman v. Bushelman, 2001 WI App 124, ¶11, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44582 - 2010-04-15
WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2119 Complete Title of...
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment determinations de novo, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2015-06-03
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment determinations de novo, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2015-06-03
Marvin DeGrave v. Door County Cooperative
in relation to a given set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Severson Agri-Service v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10918 - 2005-03-31
in relation to a given set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Severson Agri-Service v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10918 - 2005-03-31
State v. Irving T. Washington
of law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶8; see also State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26131 - 2006-08-07
of law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶8; see also State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66-67, 525 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26131 - 2006-08-07
2008 WI APP 179
: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J., and Neubauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34666 - 2008-12-16
: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J., and Neubauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34666 - 2008-12-16
Miller Brewing Company v. Department of Industry
to decide an issue, our review is de novo and we will not give any deference to the agency's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31
to decide an issue, our review is de novo and we will not give any deference to the agency's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7929 - 2005-03-31