Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 29817 for des.
Search results 20781 - 20790 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶21 We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30819 - 2007-11-07
of Review ¶21 We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30819 - 2007-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
below. DISCUSSION ¶12 We review a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640933 - 2023-04-04
below. DISCUSSION ¶12 We review a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640933 - 2023-04-04
2007 WI APP 27
§ 125.075(1), which is a question of statutory interpretation and thus one of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
§ 125.075(1), which is a question of statutory interpretation and thus one of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
State v. James E. Gray
the other acts is a question of law which we review de novo. Bustamante, 201 Wis. 2d at 570. ¶41
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17185 - 2005-03-31
the other acts is a question of law which we review de novo. Bustamante, 201 Wis. 2d at 570. ¶41
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17185 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah C. Westbury
and two violate her right against double jeopardy is a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13427 - 2005-03-31
and two violate her right against double jeopardy is a question of law, which we decide de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13427 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward F. Topping
of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d at 126. ¶16 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3633 - 2017-09-19
of this case presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Koeppen I, 195 Wis. 2d at 126. ¶16 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Biba, 2010 WI App 140, ¶6, 329 Wis. 2d 787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85106 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Biba, 2010 WI App 140, ¶6, 329 Wis. 2d 787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo." Id. Ineffective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318626 - 2021-03-01
constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo." Id. Ineffective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318626 - 2021-03-01
[PDF]
WI APP 176
interpretations de novo. Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶13, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718 N.W.2d 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42980 - 2014-09-15
interpretations de novo. Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶13, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718 N.W.2d 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 32
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶10. 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936487 - 2025-06-17
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶10. 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936487 - 2025-06-17