Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20861 - 20870 of 30242 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). To demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162594 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Henry T. Skibinski
of a statute is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct. App. 1997). A reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Leonard Chmill v. Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District
application to a set of facts are questions of law we review de novo. Reyes v. Greatway Ins. Co., 227 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4963 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robin L. Reid
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Busch, 217 Wis. 2d 429, 441, 576 N.W.2d 904 (1998). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6551 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. State v. Pocian, 2012 WI App 58, ¶6, 341 Wis. 2d 380, 814 N.W.2d 894. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445932 - 2021-10-27

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. Id. Our review on certiorari of the decision by an administrative body is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31843 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Therefore, this is a constitutional issue which we review de novo. See Holland v. State, 91 Wis. 2d 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53818 - 2010-08-31

State v. Burley Harding
trial right is a constitutional question, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14153 - 2005-05-08

COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to give Litke a preliminary breath test is a legal issue that this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108909 - 2014-03-10

Eau Claire County DHS v. Christopher D. L., Sr.
reviews de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263 Wis. 2d 612, 665 N.W.2d 212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26114 - 2006-08-07