Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 21449 for warrants.
Search results 2101 - 2110 of 21449 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
Leonard L. Jones v. State
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
be seized by any officer or [designated] employee,” either with a warrant, under a judgment or, if incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
State v. David P. Gascoigne
that: A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31
that: A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur Foster
home, where the police then executed a search warrant. While the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
home, where the police then executed a search warrant. While the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Renee failed to state a cognizable contempt claim or a substantial change in circumstances warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187470 - 2017-09-21
Renee failed to state a cognizable contempt claim or a substantial change in circumstances warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard T. Wittrock
no contest plea and that the plea withdrawal motion did not allege sufficient facts to warrant a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17635 - 2005-04-12
no contest plea and that the plea withdrawal motion did not allege sufficient facts to warrant a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17635 - 2005-04-12
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a warrant.2 The court denied the motions without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal follows. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
to a warrant.2 The court denied the motions without an evidentiary hearing. This appeal follows. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251812 - 2020-01-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, relief was not warranted on either ground. Grant appeals. “A defendant has a constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
, relief was not warranted on either ground. Grant appeals. “A defendant has a constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen A. Lloyd v. Daniel J. Lloyd
and the best interests of the children warranted a change in periods of physical placement. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21
and the best interests of the children warranted a change in periods of physical placement. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14627 - 2017-09-21