Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21001 - 21010 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 21001 - 21010 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203728 - 2017-11-28
of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203728 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Conway
. Not only is there no factual support for this assertion, the record before the court clearly indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13725 - 2014-09-15
. Not only is there no factual support for this assertion, the record before the court clearly indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
David Gunderman v. Jack Hartwig
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2851 - 2017-09-19
claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2851 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleging he was sentenced on inaccurate information. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
alleging he was sentenced on inaccurate information. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06
was sent a copy of the no-merit report, and he filed a response. Upon review of the record, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910644 - 2025-02-06