Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21041 - 21050 of 68468 for did.
Search results 21041 - 21050 of 68468 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
in jail and fined her $2,119.50. Because the jury did not find that Wilson’s BAC was greater than .17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32998 - 2008-06-11
in jail and fined her $2,119.50. Because the jury did not find that Wilson’s BAC was greater than .17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32998 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Sherman Williams
it admitted “other crimes” evidence pursuant to § 904.04, STATS. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
it admitted “other crimes” evidence pursuant to § 904.04, STATS. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 715 (1973). Therefore, the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
N.W.2d 715 (1973). Therefore, the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Schessler
not afford a basis for relief.” Schessler did not appeal. ¶3 Five years later, Schessler filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25828 - 2017-09-21
not afford a basis for relief.” Schessler did not appeal. ¶3 Five years later, Schessler filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Pittman did not establish that sentence credit was due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116632 - 2017-09-21
Pittman did not establish that sentence credit was due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116632 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carol A. Hayes
it imposed the precise sentence it did, which exceeded the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25309 - 2006-05-30
it imposed the precise sentence it did, which exceeded the parties’ joint sentencing recommendation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25309 - 2006-05-30
Elizabeth A. Ryder v. Society Insurance
conclude that the trial court’s order did not concern a special proceeding, and we therefore order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court’s order did not concern a special proceeding, and we therefore order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11925 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Brownson
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
of the computer, but a purchaser, and that he did not intentionally fail to return rental property because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him to report conduct that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56499 - 2010-11-08
part of a polygraph examination, and it was unfair to require him to report conduct that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56499 - 2010-11-08
[PDF]
State v. Brent R. Howe
is seated. See WIS. STAT. § 972.03 (1997-98).1 Howe offered a self-defense theory at trial, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13847 - 2014-09-15
is seated. See WIS. STAT. § 972.03 (1997-98).1 Howe offered a self-defense theory at trial, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13847 - 2014-09-15