Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 84383 for case number.
Search results 21191 - 21200 of 84383 for case number.
The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
, as well as the number of hours spent on the case, was fair and reasonable compensation for North Bay's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10052 - 2005-03-31
, as well as the number of hours spent on the case, was fair and reasonable compensation for North Bay's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The North Bay Co. v. Washburn County Zoning Committee
for law clerk time, as well as the number of hours spent on the case, was fair and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
for law clerk time, as well as the number of hours spent on the case, was fair and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10052 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applied to that single location. In this case that coverage is $546,400.00. In reviewing the blanket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92888 - 2014-09-15
applied to that single location. In this case that coverage is $546,400.00. In reviewing the blanket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 37
2021 WI App 37 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP1996-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371382 - 2021-07-14
2021 WI App 37 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP1996-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371382 - 2021-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
to that single location. In this case that coverage is $546,400.00. In reviewing the blanket coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92888 - 2013-02-18
to that single location. In this case that coverage is $546,400.00. In reviewing the blanket coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92888 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Department of Health Services (the Department) following a contested case hearing. The challenged agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
Department of Health Services (the Department) following a contested case hearing. The challenged agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
under § 980.01(6)(a). Based on Melendrez’s arguments and the case law he provides, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
under § 980.01(6)(a). Based on Melendrez’s arguments and the case law he provides, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested. In addition, much of the material Catherine provided had been redacted. A number of bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559111 - 2022-08-25
requested. In addition, much of the material Catherine provided had been redacted. A number of bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559111 - 2022-08-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Melendrez’s arguments and the case law he provides, we conclude that 2005 Wis. Act 434 does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53874 - 2014-09-15
on Melendrez’s arguments and the case law he provides, we conclude that 2005 Wis. Act 434 does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53874 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2010
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES DECEMBER, 2010 The cases listed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57327 - 2014-09-15
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES DECEMBER, 2010 The cases listed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57327 - 2014-09-15