Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21201 - 21210 of 46727 for show's.

State v. Audell Hernandez
that Hernandez has failed to develop a record to show that his counsel’s assistance was ineffective. Accordingly
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15396 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that the officer who arrested him observed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20

City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
that the evidence is insufficient to show that the officer who arrested him observed him for twenty minutes before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31

Tracy L. Smith v. Patricia Anderson
that argument and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Smith failed to meet her burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4151 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H. Washington
with a dangerous weapon; it is sufficient to show that the victim reasonably believed the defendant was so armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3394 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
provides that a second motion under § 974.06 is barred unless the defendant shows a “sufficient reason
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208068 - 2018-02-02

CA Blank Order
. To establish ineffective assistance of counsel a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91328 - 2013-01-03

[PDF] Michael V. Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
….” This language shows that the policy is consistent in referring to the $50,000/$100,000 limits in the plural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15623 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
that the credible evidence showed that Ganta owed Gribble $15. The court entered judgment awarding Gribble $15 plus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75596 - 2011-12-21

COURT OF APPEALS
’ by asserting inconsistent positions.” Id. A party asserting judicial estoppel must show: (1) the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31326 - 2007-12-26