Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21271 - 21280 of 74636 for public records.

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-01 - Interested persons communication
on Professional Ethics and Kelli Sue Thompson, Wisconsin State Public Defender. This rule petition asks
/supreme/docs/2101intpers.pdf - 2021-07-15

[PDF] Walworth County v. Therese B.
. Askins, assistant state public defender, Madison. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6363 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
centralizes information already in the public domain. A Chapter 980 commitment, however, could be lifelong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89657 - 2012-11-28

MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
OF WISCONSIN; AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, Defendants-Appellants. Submitted on Briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
; AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, Defendants-Appellants. Submitted on Briefs: December 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19

WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2721 Complete Title o...
is whether Douglas County jailers, who work for the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department, are “public safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99892 - 2013-08-29

[PDF] WI APP 104
Department, are “public safety employees” within the meaning of the Municipal Employment Relations Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99892 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
." Several Realtors Association publications, including its standardized form for requesting arbitration
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138327 - 2015-03-24

[PDF] Frontsheet
petition any court of record having jurisdiction of the parties . . . for an order directing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138327 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
a public reprimand and payment of an unspecified proration of the costs. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31