Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 2131 - 2140 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution protects a criminal defendant from repeated prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Lettice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233999 - 2019-01-31
Constitution protects a criminal defendant from repeated prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Lettice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233999 - 2019-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Javier hit his mother twice. ¶6 At trial, the prosecution did not call X.Y. to testify. Over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
Javier hit his mother twice. ¶6 At trial, the prosecution did not call X.Y. to testify. Over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
State v. Azis Kochiu
statements in his closing argument; (6) the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory evidence; and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15217 - 2017-09-21
statements in his closing argument; (6) the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory evidence; and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15217 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 237
? A No. Q Did he assist you in the prosecution at all? A No. He flat out said he didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30717 - 2007-11-27
? A No. Q Did he assist you in the prosecution at all? A No. He flat out said he didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30717 - 2007-11-27
State v. Richard G. White
the criminal-conviction record of the main prosecution witness was harmless. We reverse. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
the criminal-conviction record of the main prosecution witness was harmless. We reverse. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley Alan St. George
, the defense sought to present Stonefeld’s testimony in an attempt to refute the assertions made by prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3159 - 2013-11-12
, the defense sought to present Stonefeld’s testimony in an attempt to refute the assertions made by prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3159 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie Famous
intent concerning the allowable unit of prosecution under the statute. Id. “The overall test is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2260 - 2017-09-19
intent concerning the allowable unit of prosecution under the statute. Id. “The overall test is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2260 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George C. Lohmeier
to a prosecution for a crime that the victim may have been contributorily negligent.” We conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16941 - 2017-09-21
to a prosecution for a crime that the victim may have been contributorily negligent.” We conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16941 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of the court of appeals.[1] ¶2 The case involves the prosecution of a juvenile offender in adult court.[2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
of the court of appeals.[1] ¶2 The case involves the prosecution of a juvenile offender in adult court.[2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
State v. Sammy Gates
) object to improper arguments raised in the prosecution’s closing arguments, (3) object to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13718 - 2005-03-31
) object to improper arguments raised in the prosecution’s closing arguments, (3) object to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13718 - 2005-03-31