Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21371 - 21380 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court. We therefore review that determination de novo. See id., ¶¶9-10. ¶13 A party seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219941 - 2018-09-27
of the circuit court. We therefore review that determination de novo. See id., ¶¶9-10. ¶13 A party seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219941 - 2018-09-27
State v. Shawn R. Lee
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
Richard D. Herr v. State
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-04-12
WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP829 Complete Title of Ca...
, 717 N.W.2d 258. Here, the facts are undisputed. The interpretation of statutes is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91596 - 2013-11-17
, 717 N.W.2d 258. Here, the facts are undisputed. The interpretation of statutes is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91596 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
Patricia Hause v. John P. Bresina
review de novo. Danbeck v. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4590 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. Danbeck v. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI 91, ¶10, 245 Wis. 2d 186, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4590 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact and is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15297 - 2017-09-21
was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered is a question of constitutional fact and is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15297 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36519 - 2014-09-15