Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 45213 for Cost-effective.
Search results 2141 - 2150 of 45213 for Cost-effective.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Christopher L. O'Byrne
and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine that the seriousness
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16627 - 2005-03-31
and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We determine that the seriousness
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
the defendant shall pay the judgment and all costs awarded on appeal. (3) On meeting the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
the defendant shall pay the judgment and all costs awarded on appeal. (3) On meeting the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
plus costs against the Negleys. First, the Negleys claim that the trial court erred in holding that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
plus costs against the Negleys. First, the Negleys claim that the trial court erred in holding that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
the defendant shall pay the judgment and all costs awarded on appeal. (3) On meeting the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
the defendant shall pay the judgment and all costs awarded on appeal. (3) On meeting the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
plus costs against the Negleys. First, the Negleys claim that the trial court erred in holding that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
plus costs against the Negleys. First, the Negleys claim that the trial court erred in holding that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal argument concerning the effect of the purported property transfer on the foreclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88606 - 2014-09-15
legal argument concerning the effect of the purported property transfer on the foreclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88606 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
), and costs. ¶2 Attorney Lister challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting each of the four
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31
), and costs. ¶2 Attorney Lister challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting each of the four
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54030 - 2010-08-31
[PDF]
WI 108
recommends a 90-day license suspension, restitution of an unearned fee ($135.60), and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15
recommends a 90-day license suspension, restitution of an unearned fee ($135.60), and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54030 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
objection to the request by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) for imposition of full costs, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
objection to the request by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) for imposition of full costs, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123952 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
Regulation (OLR) for imposition of full costs, which total $17,801.64 as of May 21, 2014. See SCR 22.24. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123952 - 2014-10-13
Regulation (OLR) for imposition of full costs, which total $17,801.64 as of May 21, 2014. See SCR 22.24. ¶2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123952 - 2014-10-13