Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21401 - 21410 of 95505 for Shawano County Case Search.
Search results 21401 - 21410 of 95505 for Shawano County Case Search.
Frontsheet
this appeal as moot. The County believes that's the most appropriate outcome in this case, one that leaves
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99289 - 2013-09-23
this appeal as moot. The County believes that's the most appropriate outcome in this case, one that leaves
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99289 - 2013-09-23
State v. Andrea J. Ogden
. § 946.41(1) (1993-94). She entered a guilty plea to both of these counts. The La Crosse County Circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16915 - 2005-03-31
. § 946.41(1) (1993-94). She entered a guilty plea to both of these counts. The La Crosse County Circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Oneida County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21
affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Oneida County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165263 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. JESUS S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36889 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. JESUS S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case No. 2000CV57, in which Emily, by her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case No. 2000CV57, in which Emily, by her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
) the court should have given precedential or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
) the court should have given precedential or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
owed him $47,907.28 following the entry of judgment in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75132 - 2014-09-15
owed him $47,907.28 following the entry of judgment in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75132 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that Amidzich owed him $47,907.28 following the entry of judgment in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
that Amidzich owed him $47,907.28 following the entry of judgment in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF CONTEMPT IN: IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: MANITOWOC COUNTY HUMAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1140541 - 2026-07-08
OF CONTEMPT IN: IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: MANITOWOC COUNTY HUMAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1140541 - 2026-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
incarcerated. In Jodie W.’s case, Kenosha County filed a CHIPS petition after Jodie had already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102285 - 2013-09-24
incarcerated. In Jodie W.’s case, Kenosha County filed a CHIPS petition after Jodie had already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102285 - 2013-09-24