Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 29823 for des.
Search results 2151 - 2160 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45733 - 2010-01-13
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10145 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Borowski requested de novo review and the trial court conducted evidentiary hearings on February 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
. Borowski requested de novo review and the trial court conducted evidentiary hearings on February 28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins first argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins first argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2015-02-15
review of the sufficiency of the postconviction motion is de novo. Id., ¶9. Because Ehrett’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129364 - 2015-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
granted the motion to dismiss. Lacy requested a trial de novo before the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32469 - 2008-04-16
granted the motion to dismiss. Lacy requested a trial de novo before the circuit court. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32469 - 2008-04-16
[PDF]
WI 12
and regarding his decision to seek only de novo review of the Timber Sale Contract.3 ¶10 On October 24
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35382 - 2014-09-15
and regarding his decision to seek only de novo review of the Timber Sale Contract.3 ¶10 On October 24
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35382 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05
apply the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67144 - 2011-07-05