Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21511 - 21520 of 68288 for law.

State v. Gary M. Kratochwill
is a question of law which we decide without deference to the circuit court’s decision. See State v. Patricia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16065 - 2005-03-31

William J. Evers v. Andrew Matson
the administrative tribunal kept within its jurisdiction, whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11181 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
such lack of definition as to the geographic area applicable … that, as a matter of law, the nebulous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32479 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James Stankiewicz
). The legality of the stop, however, is a question of law and is reviewed de novo by this court. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as follows: After having identified himself or herself as a law enforcement officer, a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187322 - 2017-09-21

Amerequip Corporation -- New Holstein v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
presents a question of law which this court may review de novo. We disagree. Even when the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14715 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
allegations in a complaint are sufficient to state a claim against a defendant is a question of law that we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355196 - 2021-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the State appears to argue that, because case law describes a DOT record as “competent proof” of a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249716 - 2019-11-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. Whether a defendant has alleged such facts is a question of law we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07

[PDF] State v. Donald A. Bratrud
. Devanie of Michael J. Devanie Law Office of La Crosse. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19