Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21531 - 21540 of 28858 for f.

[PDF] Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
of Baltimore County, 210 F.2d 367 (4th Cir. 1954) (funds spent from reserve account under state control prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7701 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Adrian L. Williams
) provides, "[i]f a person possess [sic] or attempts to possess cocaine or cocaine base, . . . the person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17491 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Willie S. Davis
), and United States v. Meacham, 626 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1980). In Iniguez, the defendant had been charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20259 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Allen Tony Davis
attributed a number of different reasons to the need for a second trial: “[F]or all they know it could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13443 - 2017-09-21

WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1350 Complete Title of...
.’” See Scott v. McCaughtry, 810 F. Supp. 1015, 1019 (E.D. Wis. 1992) (citation omitted); see also New
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81419 - 2013-04-29

[PDF] State v. Ronald Jackson
, 943.32(1)(a), 943.30(1), STATS., and one for armed burglary in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(f) and 943.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10924 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Xiong Yang
.2d 144, 147 (1994). We therefore look to Neave for guidance in construing the phrase "[i]f a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8705 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James M. Evers
does not use the exact language, Peters' quotes from United States v. Pacente, 503 F.2d 543, 548 (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13979 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, emotional or physical harm “[i]f she were to deteriorate,” Dagenhardt responded, I would worry about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734516 - 2023-11-29

Mary Jo Howard Croake v. Paul Allen Croake
in circumstances. Wis. Stat. § 767.32(1).[5] “[F]or purposes of evaluating a substantial change in the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17775 - 2005-04-18