Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 83396 for case search.
Search results 21551 - 21560 of 83396 for case search.
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
impermissible “Catch 22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
impermissible “Catch 22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
of the case after that conference.” Nothing in the record indicates when counsel met with Ramirez
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976933 - 2025-06-27
of the case after that conference.” Nothing in the record indicates when counsel met with Ramirez
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976933 - 2025-06-27
[PDF]
Rule Order
on each petition, together with an agenda sheet listing by caption and docket number the cases assigned
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043888 - 2026-01-05
on each petition, together with an agenda sheet listing by caption and docket number the cases assigned
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043888 - 2026-01-05
[PDF]
Rule Order
on each petition, together with an agenda sheet listing by caption and docket number the cases assigned
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043888 - 2026-01-05
on each petition, together with an agenda sheet listing by caption and docket number the cases assigned
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043888 - 2026-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS
this decision. See Altman v. Heise, et al., Chippewa County case No. 2013CV3. ¶3 On February 11, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
this decision. See Altman v. Heise, et al., Chippewa County case No. 2013CV3. ¶3 On February 11, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105426 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
Donn Wendorff v. Andrew A. Oechsner
. The issue is whether No. 02-1430-FT 2 the trial court erred in dismissing the case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5295 - 2017-09-19
. The issue is whether No. 02-1430-FT 2 the trial court erred in dismissing the case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5295 - 2017-09-19
Donn Wendorff v. Andrew A. Oechsner
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did and therefore reverse.[1] ¶2 Donn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5295 - 2005-03-31
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did and therefore reverse.[1] ¶2 Donn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223005 - 2018-10-16