Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21581 - 21590 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 21581 - 21590 of 58340 for speedy trial.
State v. Jose G.
is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter the order against Jose G. On the basis of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10894 - 2005-03-31
is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter the order against Jose G. On the basis of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. N.
a number of evidentiary decisions made by the trial court and also asks this court to reverse his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
a number of evidentiary decisions made by the trial court and also asks this court to reverse his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6956 - 2017-09-20
State v. Christopher James
wife, see § 940.19(3), Stats. The trial court dismissed the sexual-assault count because, in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
wife, see § 940.19(3), Stats. The trial court dismissed the sexual-assault count because, in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31
County of Manitowoc v. Debora A. Ackley
claims that the trial court improperly reopened the record of her motion to dismiss after her motion had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2288 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court improperly reopened the record of her motion to dismiss after her motion had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2288 - 2005-03-31
Marjorie J. Jones v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
policy. The trial court concluded that American Family’s indemnification claim was barred by the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13230 - 2005-03-31
policy. The trial court concluded that American Family’s indemnification claim was barred by the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13230 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal. He claimed: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
of this appeal. He claimed: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion during the post-revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
Metropolitan Milwaukee Fair Housing Council v. The Hartford Times Press
of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order of the trial court. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10043 - 2005-03-31
of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the order of the trial court. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10043 - 2005-03-31
River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher
, as the trial court concluded, the bank's conduct was unconscionable under the Wisconsin Consumer Act, ch. 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8520 - 2005-03-31
, as the trial court concluded, the bank's conduct was unconscionable under the Wisconsin Consumer Act, ch. 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8520 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
defenses to the counterclaim, and a motion to dismiss the counterclaim. ¶5 At a court trial, Dobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144178 - 2015-07-08
defenses to the counterclaim, and a motion to dismiss the counterclaim. ¶5 At a court trial, Dobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144178 - 2015-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche
. LaRoche contends that the trial court erred in deciding that there was a sufficient factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12765 - 2017-09-21
. LaRoche contends that the trial court erred in deciding that there was a sufficient factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12765 - 2017-09-21