Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 28855 for W.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 28855 for W.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Howard W. Cameron, Jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92876 - 2013-02-17
: Howard W. Cameron, Jr., Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92876 - 2013-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sarah’s employer and her W-2s to verify the days she missed work and calculate a net daily wage to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054224 - 2025-12-23
Sarah’s employer and her W-2s to verify the days she missed work and calculate a net daily wage to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054224 - 2025-12-23
2007 WI APP 198
is ambiguous. See Kalal, 271 Wis. 2d 633, ¶¶44-46. We begin with the language of the statute, and “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29824 - 2007-08-27
is ambiguous. See Kalal, 271 Wis. 2d 633, ¶¶44-46. We begin with the language of the statute, and “[w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29824 - 2007-08-27
Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments
on the briefs of Daniel W. Stolper and Meg Vergeront, Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
on the briefs of Daniel W. Stolper and Meg Vergeront, Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 27
question four, which asked “[w]as Monica Pennell’s negligence a cause of the accident,” and referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
question four, which asked “[w]as Monica Pennell’s negligence a cause of the accident,” and referred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257997 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
Mark Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.
assumption on which the contract was made. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. Co. v. Chicago & N. W
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19442 - 2017-09-21
assumption on which the contract was made. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R.R. Co. v. Chicago & N. W
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19442 - 2017-09-21
Jerry L. Meana v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
.2d 537, 554, 289 N.W.2d 270, 278 (1980)). Thus, "[w]here ... the credible evidence supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9222 - 2005-03-31
.2d 537, 554, 289 N.W.2d 270, 278 (1980)). Thus, "[w]here ... the credible evidence supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Billie Jo S.
from orders of the circuit court for Pierce County: ROBERT W. WING, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14563 - 2017-09-21
from orders of the circuit court for Pierce County: ROBERT W. WING, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, “[w]here a circuit court, determining a petition for a writ of mandamus, has interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
. However, “[w]here a circuit court, determining a petition for a writ of mandamus, has interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18
State v. Thomas M. Raab
(citing Nelson, 54 Wis.2d at 497-98, 195 N.W.2d at 633-34). Further, “[w]hether a motion alleges facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12479 - 2005-03-31
(citing Nelson, 54 Wis.2d at 497-98, 195 N.W.2d at 633-34). Further, “[w]hether a motion alleges facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12479 - 2005-03-31