Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21591 - 21600 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Slagoski
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
Leon Thiede v. Margaret Thiede
appeal. ANALYSIS We review a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14470 - 2005-03-31
appeal. ANALYSIS We review a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14470 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Genett
), Stats. However, we review de novo the determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. However, we review de novo the determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
Breianne S. Johnson v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
of statutes, only legal questions are raised, which we review de novo. Silingo v. Village of Mukwonago, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10790 - 2005-03-31
of statutes, only legal questions are raised, which we review de novo. Silingo v. Village of Mukwonago, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Conrad J. Korbisch
or prejudice is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128. ¶26 Korbisch has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19
or prejudice is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128. ¶26 Korbisch has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rolando M. Tong
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107968 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Williams
and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236-37, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d 219, 236-37, 548 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) (reviewing cure of a plea breach de novo). ¶14 On this record, we conclude the prosecutor cured
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637599 - 2023-03-28
) (reviewing cure of a plea breach de novo). ¶14 On this record, we conclude the prosecutor cured
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637599 - 2023-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Jacob M.W.
in exercising its discretion, we review that issue de novo. Sulzer v. Diedrich, 2002 WI App 278, ¶9, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7574 - 2017-09-19
in exercising its discretion, we review that issue de novo. Sulzer v. Diedrich, 2002 WI App 278, ¶9, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7574 - 2017-09-19