Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 97721 for court records search online.
Search results 21651 - 21660 of 97721 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87920 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87920 - 2012-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
] court “to form its independent judgment after a review of the record and pleadings and to support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
] court “to form its independent judgment after a review of the record and pleadings and to support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
denying reconsideration. The circuit court reversed. The court concluded “the record was clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28805 - 2007-04-25
denying reconsideration. The circuit court reversed. The court concluded “the record was clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28805 - 2007-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 11, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 11, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court is not persuaded upon our review of the record and the arguments of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26
, this court is not persuaded upon our review of the record and the arguments of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record, we conclude the circuit court’s credibility determination is not clearly erroneous. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103098 - 2013-10-14
of the record, we conclude the circuit court’s credibility determination is not clearly erroneous. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103098 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48093 - 2010-03-17
. In an appeal to the court of appeals, if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48093 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the court called another sidebar. Afterwards, back on the record and in the presence of the jury, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
, and the court called another sidebar. Afterwards, back on the record and in the presence of the jury, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69467 - 2011-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69467 - 2011-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Thomas also cites the court’s statement, “I can’t find that [Adelaide] had any kind of track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81812 - 2012-04-30
.” Thomas also cites the court’s statement, “I can’t find that [Adelaide] had any kind of track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81812 - 2012-04-30