Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21661 - 21670 of 97721 for court records search online.

COURT OF APPEALS
and did not comply with scheduling orders. However, the record fully supports the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30831 - 2007-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
that this court followed the procedures for independently reviewing the records; we have confidence that Tillman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44702 - 2009-12-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to that matter. In reviewing the record in this case, we cannot conclude that the trial court erred. Sterling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33104 - 2008-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 23, 2012 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30997 - 2007-11-28

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 4, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58577 - 2011-01-03

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 21, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70929 - 2011-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
in the certified record. This extraneous evidence is not properly before the court. See State ex rel. Richards v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2010-04-19

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29737 - 2007-07-16

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 2, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68656 - 2011-08-01