Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21671 - 21680 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] NOTICE
for ineffective assistance of counsel claims is a mixed question of law and fact. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 127
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentence exceeded the maximum term allowed under state law, which is a viable claim under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thomas W. Wood
analyze the trial court’s ruling under the law of new factors. See Rosado v. State, 70 Wis.2d 280, 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15821 - 2017-09-21

Certification
by the officer’s controlled substance investigation. Although federal and Wisconsin case law seems to approve
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28662 - 2007-04-04

State v. Frederick B. Rogers
. Whether a new factor exists presents a question of law, which the court of appeals reviews de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31

West End Development Corporation v. Roy's Plumbing Service, Inc.
of Medford, 189 Wis. 2d 321, 324, 525 N.W.2d 276 (Ct. App. 1994). Although the law views default judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6925 - 2005-03-31

Russell I. Bratt v. Roger D. Peirce
as a matter of law. Id. We may affirm on grounds different than those relied on by the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2652 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas M. Moss
). However, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6086 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the installed property was a conditional gift presents a question of law because it entails determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32506 - 2008-04-22

COURT OF APPEALS
was not an exact quotation of this case law, the City does not explain precisely what legal difference it believes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33186 - 2008-06-25