Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21731 - 21740 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 21731 - 21740 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Williams Corner Investors, LLC v. Areawide Cellular, LLC
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6321 - 2017-09-19
the record and hearing the evidence, the trial court found no excusable neglect. The court made several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6321 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
wife Diane’s intestate estate. James Earl claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
wife Diane’s intestate estate. James Earl claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
Courtney Nunez v. American Family Mutual Insurance
was not negligent. ¶2 The Nunezes argue that the trial court erred in entering judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5173 - 2005-03-31
was not negligent. ¶2 The Nunezes argue that the trial court erred in entering judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5173 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
argues that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his preliminary breath test (PBT) without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13880 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his preliminary breath test (PBT) without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13880 - 2005-03-31
James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
. James Earl claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it concluded that the killing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9972 - 2005-03-31
. James Earl claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it concluded that the killing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a potential trial witness whose testimony was ultimately excluded. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822815 - 2024-07-10
of a potential trial witness whose testimony was ultimately excluded. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822815 - 2024-07-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
rather than Griffin’s. ¶5 After hearing the testimony, the trial court rejected Griffin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34437 - 2014-09-15
rather than Griffin’s. ¶5 After hearing the testimony, the trial court rejected Griffin’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34437 - 2014-09-15
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
appeal. Upon affirmance, the trial court ordered Edna to pay the surety companies $88,656.84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
appeal. Upon affirmance, the trial court ordered Edna to pay the surety companies $88,656.84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 In a criminal complaint filed on November 4, 1999, Quiroz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4062 - 2017-09-20
and order of the trial court. FACTS ¶2 In a criminal complaint filed on November 4, 1999, Quiroz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4062 - 2017-09-20
State v. Carlos L. Vasquez
. Vasquez's primary contention is that the trial court erred in not permitting him to withdraw his Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9970 - 2005-03-31
. Vasquez's primary contention is that the trial court erred in not permitting him to withdraw his Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9970 - 2005-03-31