Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 83436 for case code.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 83436 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Rufus Davis
to the facts as found. See State v. Fry, 131 Wis.2d 153, 171, 388 N.W.2d 565, 573 (1986). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12648 - 2017-09-21
to the facts as found. See State v. Fry, 131 Wis.2d 153, 171, 388 N.W.2d 565, 573 (1986). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12648 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Barton
2006 WI App 18 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP905-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
2006 WI App 18 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP905-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20764 - 2006-01-24
State v. Rufus Davis
). In this case, the transcript of the closing arguments is before us and there is no dispute as to what was said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
). In this case, the transcript of the closing arguments is before us and there is no dispute as to what was said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12648 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by Defendant[.] While the case was pending, Simandl & Murray filed an offer of settlement pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21
by Defendant[.] While the case was pending, Simandl & Murray filed an offer of settlement pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50325 - 2010-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Sean M. Daley
2006 WI APP 81 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP48-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 81 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP48-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dean H. Cutsforth
of evidence. Id. ΒΆ18 Cutsforth argues that the police in his case were not in hot pursuit because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
of evidence. Id. ΒΆ18 Cutsforth argues that the police in his case were not in hot pursuit because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 88
2013 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1808-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1808-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 221
2007 WI APP 221 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1705
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29861 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 221 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1705
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29861 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Shawn Radtke v. Mathew E. Levin
In these consolidated small claims cases, Mathew E. Levin appeals from the judgments, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4431 - 2017-09-19
In these consolidated small claims cases, Mathew E. Levin appeals from the judgments, following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4431 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Ronald Gaddis v. La Crosse Products, Inc.
and that there is no prejudice in this case, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals. The procedural facts giving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16934 - 2017-09-21
and that there is no prejudice in this case, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals. The procedural facts giving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16934 - 2017-09-21