Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
dismissing her dental malpractice claim against Clemens No. 2009AP381 2 K. Stoeckl, D.D.S., d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45943 - 2014-09-15
dismissing her dental malpractice claim against Clemens No. 2009AP381 2 K. Stoeckl, D.D.S., d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45943 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the Kamaras’ negligence claim. The court found that the contract does not create any type of “service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72331 - 2011-10-18
the Kamaras’ negligence claim. The court found that the contract does not create any type of “service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72331 - 2011-10-18
State v. Troy Barner
not shown how his sentence was based on inaccurate information. Finally, he cannot raise a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
not shown how his sentence was based on inaccurate information. Finally, he cannot raise a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9104 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order that denied his postconviction motions. Vega raises three claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103683 - 2013-10-30
an order that denied his postconviction motions. Vega raises three claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103683 - 2013-10-30
State v. James Jagodinsky
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(and thus whether a victim’s claim should be offset or reduced for any reason) is reviewed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
(and thus whether a victim’s claim should be offset or reduced for any reason) is reviewed under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims that misinformation as to the maximum term of initial confinement constituted a manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15
claims that misinformation as to the maximum term of initial confinement constituted a manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
the construction of a house, the builder agreed to buy it back to settle the claim. The homeowners, Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8349 - 2017-09-19
the construction of a house, the builder agreed to buy it back to settle the claim. The homeowners, Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8349 - 2017-09-19
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial was violated. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2011-07-25
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Specifically, he claims his right to a speedy trial was violated. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03