Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21851 - 21860 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 21851 - 21860 of 64027 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 15, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
than order a competency exam after finding Hall unable to knowingly enter a plea. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102958 - 2013-10-14
than order a competency exam after finding Hall unable to knowingly enter a plea. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102958 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction … [and a]ny further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04
of the record, “there [wa]s no basis for reversing the judgment of conviction … [and a]ny further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27303 - 2006-12-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, 2003, the Rubenzers commenced this action against Mensch alleging that Mensch was the record owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21
, 2003, the Rubenzers commenced this action against Mensch alleging that Mensch was the record owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27146 - 2006-11-21
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
State v. Eva M. Bakken
trial where a party challenges the statement in a pretrial motion. Further, the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
trial where a party challenges the statement in a pretrial motion. Further, the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
a discretionary decision, this court will search the record for reasons to sustain that decision. Loomans v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8136 - 2017-09-19
a discretionary decision, this court will search the record for reasons to sustain that decision. Loomans v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8136 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
together by the trial court, and this court’s review of the records and briefs indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
together by the trial court, and this court’s review of the records and briefs indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Trevor D. Jones
fails to conduct such a colloquy, a reviewing court may not find, based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2945 - 2017-09-19
fails to conduct such a colloquy, a reviewing court may not find, based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2945 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875287 - 2024-11-12
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875287 - 2024-11-12