Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 59033 for do.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 59033 for do.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ PAC 1.06(16) (Register, Nov. 2010, No. 659, eff. 12-1-10), but “the amended factors do not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
§ PAC 1.06(16) (Register, Nov. 2010, No. 659, eff. 12-1-10), but “the amended factors do not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel P. McGhee
indicated here that just do not ring true. … The record does not substantiate any fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8298 - 2017-09-19
indicated here that just do not ring true. … The record does not substantiate any fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8298 - 2017-09-19
State v. Matthew J. Buman
of a prior false accusation and how Buman intends to do so. We conclude that Olson controls this situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12796 - 2005-03-31
of a prior false accusation and how Buman intends to do so. We conclude that Olson controls this situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The parties do not dispute the facts. Rather, the issue is the circuit court’s legal conclusion that, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94137 - 2014-09-15
. The parties do not dispute the facts. Rather, the issue is the circuit court’s legal conclusion that, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94137 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory L. Cundy
recognized the driver as Mr. Cundy, what did you do? A. I conducted a traffic stop. Q. And where did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2590 - 2005-03-31
recognized the driver as Mr. Cundy, what did you do? A. I conducted a traffic stop. Q. And where did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2590 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to them. We conclude that, even if counsel had a basis to object, his failure to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
to them. We conclude that, even if counsel had a basis to object, his failure to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42482 - 2009-10-21
Michael J. Morgan v. Ford Motor Company
when it decided to equate “substantially” with “seriously.” The court stated its reasons for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
when it decided to equate “substantially” with “seriously.” The court stated its reasons for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant may rephrase the issue.”).2 ¶14 Finally, Foote argues that, even if his alleged claims do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714053 - 2023-10-12
the defendant may rephrase the issue.”).2 ¶14 Finally, Foote argues that, even if his alleged claims do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714053 - 2023-10-12
State v. Michael Stella
was unreasonable because the officer who stopped him was doing so on behalf of the first officer and the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5220 - 2005-03-31
was unreasonable because the officer who stopped him was doing so on behalf of the first officer and the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officers were responding to and investigating a citizen complaint. During the course of doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31663 - 2008-01-28
that the officers were responding to and investigating a citizen complaint. During the course of doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31663 - 2008-01-28