Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 58499 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) appeal a judgment entered following a trial to the court based on findings that: No. 2010AP1184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-15
) appeal a judgment entered following a trial to the court based on findings that: No. 2010AP1184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Mark
commitment trial as a defendant is entitled to in a criminal case. We hold that in order for a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21
commitment trial as a defendant is entitled to in a criminal case. We hold that in order for a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles W. Mark
trial as a defendant is entitled to in a criminal case. We hold that in order for a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28
trial as a defendant is entitled to in a criminal case. We hold that in order for a statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28
State v. Michael W. Carlson
affirmed an order by the Brown County Circuit Court, which denied a motion for a new trial. The motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16499 - 2005-03-31
affirmed an order by the Brown County Circuit Court, which denied a motion for a new trial. The motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16499 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry Means
. Means contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8250 - 2005-03-31
. Means contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it allowed the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8250 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
version of which was also used at Stanley’s trial. Based on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s resolution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02
version of which was also used at Stanley’s trial. Based on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s resolution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02
County of Rock v. Joy DeRone
the conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance ...." The trial court found DeRone guilty of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10551 - 2005-03-31
the conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance ...." The trial court found DeRone guilty of violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10551 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Nemetz
, and one count of fleeing an officer. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6701 - 2005-03-31
, and one count of fleeing an officer. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6701 - 2005-03-31
John Novak v. Leon D. Stenz
against the estate. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion to vacate but erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14377 - 2005-03-31
against the estate. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion to vacate but erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark William Jagla v. Douglas J. Guenthner
that the trial court erred by concluding that as a matter of law none of the three named defendants were guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9154 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by concluding that as a matter of law none of the three named defendants were guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9154 - 2017-09-19