Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2191 - 2200 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 2191 - 2200 of 58267 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Brown contends that: (1) he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115235 - 2014-06-23
motion. Brown contends that: (1) he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115235 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
directed us to address Kucharski’s three remaining unaddressed issues: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162280 - 2017-09-21
directed us to address Kucharski’s three remaining unaddressed issues: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways and his postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways and his postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
have been granted because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88167 - 2012-10-15
have been granted because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88167 - 2012-10-15
State v. Tommy Lopez
. He argues that the trial court erroneously denied Lopez’s: (1) presentence motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26129 - 2006-08-07
. He argues that the trial court erroneously denied Lopez’s: (1) presentence motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26129 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Tremell Jackson
for postconviction relief. Jackson contends that the trial court: (1) erred in not permitting him to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
for postconviction relief. Jackson contends that the trial court: (1) erred in not permitting him to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
State v. Tremell Jackson
that the trial court: (1) erred in not permitting him to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6730 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court: (1) erred in not permitting him to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so I popped her.’” ¶4 The case remained in a trial posture for more than a year. One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
so I popped her.’” ¶4 The case remained in a trial posture for more than a year. One week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
Walter L. Merten v. Thermo Dynamic Systems, Inc.
errors were committed by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14763 - 2005-03-31
errors were committed by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14763 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12
is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12