Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 52159 for him.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 52159 for him.
State v. Charles R. Wincek
Wincek appeals from a judgment convicting him on one count of failing to obey a Department of Agriculture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
Wincek appeals from a judgment convicting him on one count of failing to obey a Department of Agriculture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Harris
Harris appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of tetrahydrocannabinols (marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31
Harris appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of tetrahydrocannabinols (marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julian Esteve McKinnie
McKinnie with and convicting him of felony murder: (a) as a party to the crime; and (b) for the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
McKinnie with and convicting him of felony murder: (a) as a party to the crime; and (b) for the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Hansen appeals a judgment convicting him of robbing three businesses. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Hansen appeals a judgment convicting him of robbing three businesses. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30533 - 2007-10-09
State v. Gerald Heckathorn
contended that counsel’s untimeliness cost him the opportunity to suppress the evidence used to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
contended that counsel’s untimeliness cost him the opportunity to suppress the evidence used to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17824 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the record from the hearing. The officer was asked only if he had a flashlight with him, and he testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
by the record from the hearing. The officer was asked only if he had a flashlight with him, and he testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
State v. Kevin O'Hare
not have been admitted and that it prejudiced him such that he should get a new trial on all charges. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10107 - 2005-03-31
not have been admitted and that it prejudiced him such that he should get a new trial on all charges. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. § 767.24. He first argues that by changing Susanna’s school-year placement with him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
Wis. Stat. § 767.24. He first argues that by changing Susanna’s school-year placement with him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
Robert P. Stupar and Terry L. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
witness saw him mowing this portion of the grass. The children visited only six or seven weeks out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10205 - 2005-03-31
witness saw him mowing this portion of the grass. The children visited only six or seven weeks out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10205 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith S. Betts
“uncounseled juvenile adjudications” in sentencing him. We rejected Betts's arguments and summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8005 - 2005-03-31
“uncounseled juvenile adjudications” in sentencing him. We rejected Betts's arguments and summarily affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8005 - 2005-03-31