Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 29810 for des.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 29810 for des.
Richard D. Herr v. State
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30
appeals. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review the granting of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ortiz-Mondragon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723122 - 2023-10-31
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Ortiz-Mondragon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723122 - 2023-10-31
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
is one of law. Koestler v. Pollard, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17364 - 2005-03-31
is one of law. Koestler v. Pollard, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 Here, for the reasons that follow, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980592 - 2025-07-10
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶20 Here, for the reasons that follow, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980592 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 13
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
to an undisputed set of facts presents us with a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27329 - 2007-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 8, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
. The application of the facts to the unjust enrichment legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29906 - 2007-08-07
. The application of the facts to the unjust enrichment legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29906 - 2007-08-07
2007 WI APP 119
conclusions of law de novo, First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28383 - 2007-04-26
conclusions of law de novo, First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28383 - 2007-04-26
Associated/F&M Bank v. Ray A. Johnson
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3864 - 2005-03-31