Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Walter L. Merten v. Thermo Dynamic Systems, Inc.
errors were committed by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14763 - 2005-03-31
errors were committed by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14763 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12
is entitled to resentencing because: (1) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (2) his trial lawyer provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
) the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (2) his trial lawyer provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Walter L. Merten v. Thermo Dynamic Systems, Inc.
by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude that the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14763 - 2017-09-21
by the trial court during pretrial proceedings and at trial. We conclude that the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the judgment, convicting him following a jury trial, of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
appeals the judgment, convicting him following a jury trial, of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by “advising Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184940 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by “advising Mason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. No. 2015AP1538-CRNM 3 an NGI plea would not be supported. Mack and his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
report. No. 2015AP1538-CRNM 3 an NGI plea would not be supported. Mack and his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and thus she should be permitted to withdraw it. She further asserts that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
and thus she should be permitted to withdraw it. She further asserts that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Gary D. Perry
of a Child, see § 948.02(2), STATS., and the trial court's order denying him postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10449 - 2017-09-20
of a Child, see § 948.02(2), STATS., and the trial court's order denying him postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10449 - 2017-09-20
State v. Adrian L. Williams
postconviction motion. Williams argues that the trial court should have permitted him to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Williams argues that the trial court should have permitted him to withdraw his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31