Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22041 - 22050 of 58507 for speedy trial.

Sheboygan County v. Andrew C.H.
In answer to the trial court’s questions about Andrew’s medication program, Cahill stated that Andrew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16130 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. “[T]he findings of fact, if any, of the trial court will be sustained unless against the great weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13

[PDF] NOTICE
granting or denying a suppression motion. “[T]he findings of fact, if any, of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15

Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
of witnesses at that hearing. We cannot overturn a trial court’s credibility determinations. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15711 - 2005-03-31

Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
of witnesses at that hearing. We cannot overturn a trial court’s credibility determinations. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15712 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. He argues his trial counsel was ineffective for three reasons: (1) counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194577 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tony G. Longmire
statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.20 (2001-02).[1] ¶2 We agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for Medicaid fraud 1 and theft by false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215149 - 2018-07-03

[PDF] State v. Tony G. Longmire
(2001-02).1 ¶2 We agree that the trial court improperly denied Longmire an offset for work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Randy D. Stafford
also conclude that the trial court erred in determining that this new factor did not warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4991 - 2017-09-19