Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22191 - 22200 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22191 - 22200 of 29823 for des.
State v. Richard C. Wos
we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 225 Wis. 2d 159, 168, 591 N.W.2d 823 (1999). DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 225 Wis. 2d 159, 168, 591 N.W.2d 823 (1999). DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50288 - 2011-11-24
. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50288 - 2011-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33032 - 2014-09-15
determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33032 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶8 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶8 To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
Hans S. Pawlisch v. The Otto V. Pawlisch Trust for Carl V. Pawlisch
, ¶10, 260 Wis. 2d 815, 660 N.W.2d 308. Despite this de novo standard of review, we value the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6531 - 2015-01-12
, ¶10, 260 Wis. 2d 815, 660 N.W.2d 308. Despite this de novo standard of review, we value the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6531 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
State v. Charles E. Jackson
the postconviction court’s determination on discriminatory intent de novo because although it was also the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
the postconviction court’s determination on discriminatory intent de novo because although it was also the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6900 - 2005-03-31
The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 202 Wis.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 202 Wis.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-06-02
a question of statutory interpretation, we review Thornton’s challenge de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62727 - 2011-06-02
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31
of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd. of Supervisors, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13771 - 2005-03-31