Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 17421 for Cost.
Frontsheet
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $26,988.61 as of August 16, 2012. ¶2 After
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92284 - 2013-01-29
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $26,988.61 as of August 16, 2012. ¶2 After
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92284 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
John S. Bergmann v. Gail Faust
an order permitting the action to proceed without payment of the filing fee of $120 and other costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14450 - 2017-09-21
an order permitting the action to proceed without payment of the filing fee of $120 and other costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
awarded the Seller its freezer-storage costs for storing the volume of cranberries rejected by the Buyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171776 - 2017-09-21
awarded the Seller its freezer-storage costs for storing the volume of cranberries rejected by the Buyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171776 - 2017-09-21
John S. Bergmann v. Gail Faust
payment of the filing fee of $120 and other costs. Faust’s return to the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14450 - 2005-03-31
payment of the filing fee of $120 and other costs. Faust’s return to the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14450 - 2005-03-31
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. William D. Ridgely
an order denying his request for damages and costs in this open records case. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his request for damages and costs in this open records case. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
for costs was not timely filed and that the action was not frivolous. We conclude that the motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13310 - 2005-03-31
for costs was not timely filed and that the action was not frivolous. We conclude that the motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 17-06 - Hon. John P. Anderson
the counties, requiring that they shoulder the costs which are supposed to be covered by the state through
/supreme/docs/1706commentsanderson.pdf - 2018-04-02
the counties, requiring that they shoulder the costs which are supposed to be covered by the state through
/supreme/docs/1706commentsanderson.pdf - 2018-04-02
[PDF]
John S. Bergmann v. Gary R. McCaughtry
monitor conclusively established his guilt. Costs are assessed against Bergmann. Upon service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8470 - 2017-09-19
monitor conclusively established his guilt. Costs are assessed against Bergmann. Upon service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rodney O. Slotten v. State
a $7,000 replacement cost, and put up a new $70,000 hangar in its place. ¶3 The DOT paid Slotten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16282 - 2017-09-21
a $7,000 replacement cost, and put up a new $70,000 hangar in its place. ¶3 The DOT paid Slotten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
For the reasons stated below, I affirm the circuit court’s orders. I also grant the City’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174091 - 2017-09-21
For the reasons stated below, I affirm the circuit court’s orders. I also grant the City’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174091 - 2017-09-21