Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶32 Lowe contends that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶32 Lowe contends that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony G. Longmire
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.[6] American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96548 - 2013-05-08
that we review de novo.[6] American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96548 - 2013-05-08
[PDF]
Northridge Company v. W.R. Grace & Company
. All three arguments raise issues subject to our de novo review. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
. All three arguments raise issues subject to our de novo review. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Gordon
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See County of Kenosha v. C & S Mgmt., Inc., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4104 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See County of Kenosha v. C & S Mgmt., Inc., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4104 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carlos R. Delgado
of this record was de minimis— they were only marginally relevant to proof of “manifest bias,” which, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11190 - 2017-09-19
of this record was de minimis— they were only marginally relevant to proof of “manifest bias,” which, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11190 - 2017-09-19
James A. Finch v. Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
, a question of law that we decide de novo. See Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade (Beloit II), 2004 WI 39, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5717 - 2005-03-31
, a question of law that we decide de novo. See Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade (Beloit II), 2004 WI 39, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court properly ordered mandamus relief based on the facts of record is reviewed de novo,” citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
the circuit court properly ordered mandamus relief based on the facts of record is reviewed de novo,” citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
2006 WI APP 199
§ 100.01. The proper construction of a statute is a question of law, for our de novo review. General Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26586 - 2006-10-30
§ 100.01. The proper construction of a statute is a question of law, for our de novo review. General Cas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26586 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
of “‘constitutional fact’” that we determine de novo. State v. St. George, 2002 WI 50, ¶16, 252 Wis. 2d 499, 643
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28265 - 2014-09-15
of “‘constitutional fact’” that we determine de novo. State v. St. George, 2002 WI 50, ¶16, 252 Wis. 2d 499, 643
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28265 - 2014-09-15