Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 29823 for des.
2008 WI APP 68
of the agency, not that of the circuit court. Jocz, 196 Wis. 2d at 289-90. We review de novo an administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32473 - 2011-06-14
of the agency, not that of the circuit court. Jocz, 196 Wis. 2d at 289-90. We review de novo an administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32473 - 2011-06-14
Ricki A. Ritt v. Dental Care Associates
). The meaning of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 438, 468 N.W.2d at 22
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8404 - 2005-03-31
). The meaning of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 438, 468 N.W.2d at 22
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884771 - 2024-12-03
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884771 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶32 Lowe contends that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶32 Lowe contends that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony G. Longmire
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.[6] American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96548 - 2013-05-08
that we review de novo.[6] American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23, 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96548 - 2013-05-08
[PDF]
Northridge Company v. W.R. Grace & Company
. All three arguments raise issues subject to our de novo review. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
. All three arguments raise issues subject to our de novo review. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Gordon
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See County of Kenosha v. C & S Mgmt., Inc., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4104 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See County of Kenosha v. C & S Mgmt., Inc., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4104 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carlos R. Delgado
of this record was de minimis— they were only marginally relevant to proof of “manifest bias,” which, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11190 - 2017-09-19
of this record was de minimis— they were only marginally relevant to proof of “manifest bias,” which, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11190 - 2017-09-19
James A. Finch v. Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
, a question of law that we decide de novo. See Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade (Beloit II), 2004 WI 39, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5717 - 2005-03-31
, a question of law that we decide de novo. See Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade (Beloit II), 2004 WI 39, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5717 - 2005-03-31