Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22491 - 22500 of 63531 for records/1000.
Search results 22491 - 22500 of 63531 for records/1000.
State v. Curtiss J. Swoboda
, 493 (1992). Discretion contemplates a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
, 493 (1992). Discretion contemplates a logical process of reasoning based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Womble
, 274, 389 N.W.2d 12, 26 (1986). The record shows by clear and convincing evidence that Womble knew he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
, 274, 389 N.W.2d 12, 26 (1986). The record shows by clear and convincing evidence that Womble knew he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97572 - 2013-06-04
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97572 - 2013-06-04
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8, 2000, the trial court’s primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8, 2000, the trial court’s primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70535 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316550 - 2020-12-22
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316550 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
Michael Solomon v. Gary R. McCaughtry
shall consider the following: (1) The inmate’s overall disciplinary record, especially during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12940 - 2017-09-21
shall consider the following: (1) The inmate’s overall disciplinary record, especially during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Richard Hurd
that the undisputed facts establish that Hurd nevertheless agreed to the nonrenewal. The record, however, does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11278 - 2017-09-19
that the undisputed facts establish that Hurd nevertheless agreed to the nonrenewal. The record, however, does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11278 - 2017-09-19