Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 82690 for case code.
Search results 2251 - 2260 of 82690 for case code.
Tara Kestel-Rauls v. Dale T. Moore
deposit, in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06(3). The tenants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13377 - 2005-03-31
deposit, in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06(3). The tenants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2599 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2599 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14472 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
worthless information, “they will be charged.” ¶3 In this case, the confidential informant said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91694 - 2013-01-22
worthless information, “they will be charged.” ¶3 In this case, the confidential informant said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91694 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Michael I.
revision because WIS. ADM. CODE § HSS 80.02(13)(i),1 excludes public assistance when determining gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
revision because WIS. ADM. CODE § HSS 80.02(13)(i),1 excludes public assistance when determining gross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
finding that Andrashko was guilty of violating Wis. Adm. Code §§ DOC 303.24 (disobeying orders); 303.25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
finding that Andrashko was guilty of violating Wis. Adm. Code §§ DOC 303.24 (disobeying orders); 303.25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
WIS. ADM. CODE §§ DOC 303.24 (disobeying No. 95-1042 -2- orders); 303.25 (disrespect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8920 - 2017-09-19
WIS. ADM. CODE §§ DOC 303.24 (disobeying No. 95-1042 -2- orders); 303.25 (disrespect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8920 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael I.
in circumstances justifying a child support revision because Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(13)(i),[1] excludes public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15482 - 2005-03-31
in circumstances justifying a child support revision because Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(13)(i),[1] excludes public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15482 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
on the battery. At the time Dillard’s conduct report was issued, WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.12 provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4857 - 2017-09-19
on the battery. At the time Dillard’s conduct report was issued, WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.12 provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4857 - 2017-09-19
Central Wisconsin Inspection Service, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Industry
activity other than a fee that is listed in § ILHR 2.43, Wis. Adm. Code, or a fee that has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11180 - 2005-03-31
activity other than a fee that is listed in § ILHR 2.43, Wis. Adm. Code, or a fee that has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11180 - 2005-03-31
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
by Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.86. By major conduct report, Simmons was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
by Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.86. By major conduct report, Simmons was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31