Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22511 - 22520 of 29827 for des.
Search results 22511 - 22520 of 29827 for des.
St. Clare Hospital of Monroe v. City of Monroe
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
the County satisfied its burden de novo. Melanie L., 349 Wis. 2d 148, ¶¶38-39. ¶23 This is, in my view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913011 - 2025-02-13
[PDF]
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
92 CV 201 Robert E. Moss v. Mt. Morris Mutual Insurance Company
JNOV de novo, following the same methodology as that employed by the trial court. State v. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12210 - 2017-09-21
JNOV de novo, following the same methodology as that employed by the trial court. State v. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12210 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 3
is a question of law that we review de novo applying the same principles used in statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467544 - 2022-02-21
is a question of law that we review de novo applying the same principles used in statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467544 - 2022-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which must be decided by this court de novo. Forbes contends that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120484 - 2014-09-15
of law, which must be decided by this court de novo. Forbes contends that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jay Andrew Felli
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18293 - 2017-09-21
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18293 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the claim came before the circuit court, Judge C. William Foust, for a trial de novo. Hamre, the Pontidoros
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99235 - 2013-07-10
, the claim came before the circuit court, Judge C. William Foust, for a trial de novo. Hamre, the Pontidoros
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99235 - 2013-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Hoover, 2003 WI App 117, ¶7, 265 Wis. 2d 607, 666 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303623 - 2020-11-17
is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Hoover, 2003 WI App 117, ¶7, 265 Wis. 2d 607, 666 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303623 - 2020-11-17
Sandra K. Ward v. Dennis Jahnke
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Waage, 188 Wis.2d at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12791 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See Waage, 188 Wis.2d at 328, 525 N.W.2d at 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12791 - 2005-03-31