Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 22551 - 22560 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Loss Prevention Systems v. Alpha Omega Security, Inc.
costs and interest. Because we conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14360 - 2005-03-31
costs and interest. Because we conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals trial court orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
, pro se, appeals trial court orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157478 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by JFM. We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted and affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
by JFM. We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted and affirm the trial court’s order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60218 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
of resentencing ordered in lieu of his request to withdraw his plea, and in March 2006 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. 3 ¶4 Buchanan filed a postconviction motion alleging that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198044 - 2017-10-24
’ extended supervision. 3 ¶4 Buchanan filed a postconviction motion alleging that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198044 - 2017-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility of custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the admissibility of custodial statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance from his trial lawyer because his lawyer should have called a third-party eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115155 - 2017-09-21
ineffective assistance from his trial lawyer because his lawyer should have called a third-party eyewitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The following facts are from the testimony at the bench trial held on December 16, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21
Bruce Martindale v. Bruce A. Ripp
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court’s erroneous evidentiary rulings. Specifically, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly admitted “other acts” evidence against Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19
. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly admitted “other acts” evidence against Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11217 - 2017-09-19