Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.

WI app 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2639 Complete Title o...
. The circuit court concluded that neither the Town nor the Sanitary District had standing to bring a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100356 - 2014-09-24

Firstar Bank of Milwaukee, N.A. v. Carl W. Berntsen
, prior to the hearing the Berntsens sent a letter to the trial court disputing the amounts claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Darla L. Gebhard v. Kelvin G. Gebhard
that the trial judge did not make a sufficient subjective determination as to his impartiality. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4437 - 2017-09-19

State v. Russell L. Rose
of a Machner[1] hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim was that his plea was involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
cross-appeal, challenging the circuit court’s denial of its claim for statutory pre- judgment interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90473 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
was at Harpt’s Lake on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph Eckstein
conviction for conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree intentional homicide. Eckstein claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31

Lynda Kramschuster v. Shawn E.
). In this case, McClelland argues that Kramschuster’s complaint fails to state a claim because the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11687 - 2005-03-31

State v. Damone J. Block
., also known as the “three strikes” law, on equal protection grounds.[1] Block claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13243 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. As a result, the commission dismissed Ott’s claim. Ott argues that three findings of fact the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20