Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
WI app 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2639 Complete Title o...
. The circuit court concluded that neither the Town nor the Sanitary District had standing to bring a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100356 - 2013-09-24
. The circuit court concluded that neither the Town nor the Sanitary District had standing to bring a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100356 - 2013-09-24
Firstar Bank of Milwaukee, N.A. v. Carl W. Berntsen
, prior to the hearing the Berntsens sent a letter to the trial court disputing the amounts claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31
, prior to the hearing the Berntsens sent a letter to the trial court disputing the amounts claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Darla L. Gebhard v. Kelvin G. Gebhard
that the trial judge did not make a sufficient subjective determination as to his impartiality. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4437 - 2017-09-19
that the trial judge did not make a sufficient subjective determination as to his impartiality. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4437 - 2017-09-19
State v. Russell L. Rose
of a Machner[1] hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim was that his plea was involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
of a Machner[1] hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim was that his plea was involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
was at Harpt’s Lake on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
was at Harpt’s Lake on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
State v. Damone J. Block
., also known as the “three strikes” law, on equal protection grounds.[1] Block claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13243 - 2005-03-31
., also known as the “three strikes” law, on equal protection grounds.[1] Block claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. As a result, the commission dismissed Ott’s claim. Ott argues that three findings of fact the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
. As a result, the commission dismissed Ott’s claim. Ott argues that three findings of fact the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Here, Germano’s claim would have to be that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144512 - 2015-07-12
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Here, Germano’s claim would have to be that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144512 - 2015-07-12
State v. Terrance J. Trammell
for postconviction relief.[1] Trammell claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[1] Trammell claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
Payrollwise, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corporation
an order denying its motion for summary judgment.[1] It claims the trial court erred in denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6630 - 2005-03-31
an order denying its motion for summary judgment.[1] It claims the trial court erred in denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6630 - 2005-03-31