Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22621 - 22630 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Russell L. Rose
of a Machner[1] hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim was that his plea was involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
of a Machner[1] hearing. Rose’s counsel explained that Rose’s claim was that his plea was involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cross-appeal, challenging the circuit court’s denial of its claim for statutory pre- judgment interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90473 - 2014-09-15
cross-appeal, challenging the circuit court’s denial of its claim for statutory pre- judgment interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90473 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cody J. Vandenberg
was at Harpt’s Lake on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
was at Harpt’s Lake on July 14-15, 1995. Vandenberg claimed that this testimony provided newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13086 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph Eckstein
conviction for conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree intentional homicide. Eckstein claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
conviction for conspiracy and solicitation to commit first-degree intentional homicide. Eckstein claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
Lynda Kramschuster v. Shawn E.
). In this case, McClelland argues that Kramschuster’s complaint fails to state a claim because the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11687 - 2005-03-31
). In this case, McClelland argues that Kramschuster’s complaint fails to state a claim because the facts alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11687 - 2005-03-31
State v. Damone J. Block
., also known as the “three strikes” law, on equal protection grounds.[1] Block claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13243 - 2005-03-31
., also known as the “three strikes” law, on equal protection grounds.[1] Block claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Ott v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. As a result, the commission dismissed Ott’s claim. Ott argues that three findings of fact the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
. As a result, the commission dismissed Ott’s claim. Ott argues that three findings of fact the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7169 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Here, Germano’s claim would have to be that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144512 - 2015-07-12
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Here, Germano’s claim would have to be that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144512 - 2015-07-12
State v. Terrance J. Trammell
for postconviction relief.[1] Trammell claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[1] Trammell claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16023 - 2005-03-31
Payrollwise, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corporation
an order denying its motion for summary judgment.[1] It claims the trial court erred in denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6630 - 2005-03-31
an order denying its motion for summary judgment.[1] It claims the trial court erred in denying its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6630 - 2005-03-31