Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 52742 for address.
Search results 22701 - 22710 of 52742 for address.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2013 hearing, in which the circuit court addressed McKenzie’s motion for sentence modification. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
, 2013 hearing, in which the circuit court addressed McKenzie’s motion for sentence modification. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
that a sentencing court must address are: (1) the gravity of the offense; (2) the character and rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
that a sentencing court must address are: (1) the gravity of the offense; (2) the character and rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
portion of the multi-family lot. This situation must be addressed by either complete removal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
portion of the multi-family lot. This situation must be addressed by either complete removal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derek A. Hinton
for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. A motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. A motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark D. Pett
. Consequently, Pett stated that his motions had been sufficiently addressed. The court order permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2011-02-02
. Consequently, Pett stated that his motions had been sufficiently addressed. The court order permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5726 - 2011-02-02
State v. Gary L. Everts
. Stat. § 973.155 for the entire time served between October 6, 2001, and February 1, 2002. We address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
. Stat. § 973.155 for the entire time served between October 6, 2001, and February 1, 2002. We address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
dismissed this appeal as moot. We reverse that order and address the Iowa County Circuit Court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237653 - 2019-03-19
dismissed this appeal as moot. We reverse that order and address the Iowa County Circuit Court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237653 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and we need not address the question of reasonable suspicion. See State v. Manuel, 2005 WI 75, ¶25 n.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174883 - 2017-09-21
, and we need not address the question of reasonable suspicion. See State v. Manuel, 2005 WI 75, ¶25 n.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
frames three appellate issues. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we will address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
frames three appellate issues. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we will address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; if he fails to establish one prong, this court need not address the other prong. See State v. Johnson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185239 - 2017-09-21
; if he fails to establish one prong, this court need not address the other prong. See State v. Johnson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185239 - 2017-09-21