Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22871 - 22880 of 57221 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
that should have been provided at the hearing.” Id. If the parent makes a prima facie showing, the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45174 - 2009-12-28

Cap Gemini America, Inc. v. Gary M. Ringstad
or unfair competition. Id. at 283, 514 N.W.2d at 38-39. Accordingly, § 103.465[5] provides: A covenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11504 - 2005-03-31

State v. Juan Mata
is a question of constitutional fact, which we review independently of the trial court’s holding. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14602 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to do substantial justice.” Id. ¶9 In Miller, our supreme court explained that there are five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974839 - 2025-06-26

[PDF] State v. William F. Jorgensen
the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
of Strickland are mixed questions of law and fact. Id. at 698. Findings of historic or evidentiary fact may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a demonstrated rational process, reached a reasonable conclusion.” Id. ¶13 Here, the court allowed Knaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79656 - 2012-03-19

[PDF] WI APP 67
the court’s application of established facts to the language of the contract. See id. 1. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36229 - 2014-09-15

State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
was prejudiced as a result of this deficient conduct. See id. at 687; see also State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7228 - 2005-03-31

WI App 11 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP762 Complete Title of ...
of law, and we accord one of three levels of deference to the ALJ’s statutory interpretation. Id. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131960 - 2015-03-11